Back labels: blurb or bumf?
Contemplating the purpose of that wine copy.
Remember the time when a wine bottel had one label? In that era, the barest minimum was sufficient inspiration for wine lovers. Essentially, only identification (producer, style/type, vintage) was the purpose of the piece of paper stuck on the front of the bottle.
These days the so-called ‘black label’ is de rigueur – and so ingrained in consumer perception that a bottle without it seems to have something missing in its packaging.
But what is the real purpose of today’s back label?
The simple answer is that it is supposed to tell you more about the wine – implying that the work that the front label did well for so many centuries is not enough. It’s a reasonable argument, given the free-flowing, still booming universe of wines out there. So, yeah, the confused consumer probably do need a hand.
But it’s what the producer tells that consumer – those words, wistfully, wise or otherwise, on the label (sometimes matched to a little illustration) – that, on closer scrutiny, is an interesting issue for debate.
From a pure marketing/advertising point of view, the intension is straightforward: convince the nosey, potential wine buyer that yours is exactly the one bottle of wine to fork out money for. The one to take home.
Developing and getting to that ‘unique selling proposition’ is the classic mantra that powers the very business of marketing and advertising. Anyone who has ever had just a peep at this insider business, will tell you how terribly challenging and difficult it is.
So coming up with sleek, hard (or soft) selling text for that back label – the kind of copy that will knock the socks off every other neighbouring bottle on the wine shop shelve – is no kindergarten job.
Why is it then that, if you take time to read some of the stuff on the back of bottles these days, you want to throw up your arms and shout ‘dunce!’
Seriously off-putting is back label copy riddled with puny adjectives and awkward odes to the liquid inside and the skill of the fabulous winemaker. ‘Delicate’, ‘crisp’ ‘delightful’, ‘lingering’ … the clichés are endless. Not only is this pompous and pretentious, if not empty promises, but, like any consumer product, open to individual question.
Naturally this applies also to those ‘whiffs of tobacco, swirls of cherries and aftertaste of roasted whatever’ that the more ‘serious’ notes offer. What if I’ve never tasted a roasted whatever? It may be a little more thoughtful and considerate, but the fact remains – as so much research shows - that individuals smell, taste, and perceive differently.
So what’s to go on the back label, if one is truly needed?
How about simply a note about the wine’s profile and the maker’s intention? A little background, as’t were. Something sensible. Leave the consumer to evaluate, judge and decide on the adjectives.
- Melvyn Minnaar's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Re: Back labels: blurb or bumf?
It's just one of many things they do better than most, but Kanonkop's back labels rock.
Re: Back labels: blurb or bumf?
Hi Melvyn,
Enjoyed this post - funny and very down to earth. I totally agree about taste being individual/ different and pretentious wine waffle really doesn't help the consumer.
I have quoted you and linked your post in an article I wrote on labels for The Horse's Mouth (Excelsior Wine Estate) www.excelsiorwineblog.wordpress.com
Kind regards, Emily
Re: Back labels: blurb or bumf?
Hi Kwispedoor,
Intrigued by your comment - what is it you particularly like about Kanonkop's back labels?
Kind regards, Emily
Re: Back labels: blurb or bumf?
I think I saw your article is very lucky. Continue, I will pay attention to your.
Handbags lv
Re: Back labels: blurb or bumf?
Author is really good at her work. This was one of the best I had ever seen. Thanks a lot for posting this and please keep posting interesting things like that. All the best for your future posts. http://www.pharmaexpressrx.net/
Re: Back labels: blurb or bumf?
wineries in the world must have their own self storage which would be a place where they could fermint all the wines.
Re: Back labels: blurb or bumf?
Re: Back labels: blurb or bumf?
I have read this article .It definitely stretches the limits with the mind when you go through very good info and make an effort to interpret it properly.
best underwear for men
Re: Back labels: blurb or bumf?
A declassified First Growth, no matter how high the level of the selection, may not be any better than a lesser growth - but a lesser growth at a much higher price.
fashion-innsRe: Back labels: blurb or bumf?
What's up, for all time i used to check blog posts here early in the break of day, for the reason that i love to find out more and more.Ovarian Cyst Miracle