Hard work among the vines

A review of Grape: Stories of the Vineyards in South Africa by Jeanne Viall, Wilmot James and Jakes Gerwel. Tafelberg 2011; paperback, 270pp; R199

So much of the history of European settlement and conquest in southern Africa revolves around the search for others to do the hard work. The “servant question” was clear  enough in my own suburban white upbringing, but for some reason its real historical pervasiveness only hit me when I learnt (much later – certainly not at school) just how many black servants were taken on the Great Trekkers’ quest for freedom. It’s always salutory to be reminded how often freedom for some is predicated on servitude for others. This book, which is substantially a social history of farmworkers associated with the wine and table-grape industries, is forthright about their sufferings.

The search for labour other than the indentured servants of the Dutch East India Company began very early in the Cape – as did the wine industry. By 1659, when the Cape’s first wine was pressed, imported slaves outnumbered the total of soldiers, company officials and burghers, and their numbers would grow until the the whole sorry business was ended formally in 1834 (and replaced by laws and practices scarcely less harsh). In the early 19th century, owners of winefarms each possessed, on average, 16 slaves.

Yoking the indigenous Khoisan into the labour force took longer, but the process was inexorable as the settlement expanded. Equally inexorable, though based on more attractive human urgings as well as on power, was the miscegenation which produced the coloured people (Grape uses the term without quotation marks; so shall I), still the workforce of the wine industry. Wilmot James, who along with Jakes Gerwel “reviewed, guided and advised” Jeanne Viall in her research and writing, has explained that he has long wanted to “write the story of so-called coloured people, without actually writing about ‘coloureds'”.

This is the result, and the book is less the easy-going and even celebratory set of stories implied in its clumsily formulated subtitle than a mostly sombre account of exploitation and hardship. So it should be; there is real need for more counterweight to the wine industry’s tendency to silence on its origins in slavery and on the harsh conditions prevailing for many of its participants.

Viall tries to find the positive side – despite early suggestions that the wine industry is a misconceived project in terms of economic rationality, and despite the social problems it has specificlly engendered: that “shadow of the vine, the dop system” and the misery of endemic alcoholism it helped originate is a percurrent theme. But, aside from human resilience, there is, frankly, little positive to point to, even if you peer hopefully beyond the structures of power to find that “there are good farmers and bad farmers”. There are indeed some heroes and, rightly, the works of hope at the Solms-Delta estate in Franschhoek receive most attention here. The book says little about BEE in the wine industry – just as well, perhaps, as the industry’s efforts are on the whole dispiriting, and its Transformation Charter offers a racial discourse largely pivoting the idea of change away from winery labourers and grape pickers to owners of lands and brands.

A problem of the book’s undeclared real theme is a lack of focus. The “coloured history” idea allows, for example, accounts of the flower sellers of Strawberry Lane and the establishment of the little town of Pniel, which are interesting and characteristically well researched, but of little relevance to vineyards. By-the-way interpolations are frequent. Grape is more dense than fat, but certainly a slimmer book is trying to emerge. A sharp, ruthless editor would also have trimmed detail, which is too often tedious, even in some of the portraits of people that enliven the story.

Viall’s strategy is impressionistic and additive. It’s easy to imagine her “guides and advisors” urging her to include yet one more element rather than advising her to clear away the clutter. An advisor in the history of wine and vineyards might, however, have helped to achieve a more rigorously relevant structure and give context. As it is, there seems little coherence in decisions on what to include and what not. Why, in a social history anguished about alcoholism, a pleasant account of the development of the pinotage grape, but nothing about the racially based prohibition and semi-prohibition though the first 60 or 70 years of the twentieth century?

A recommendation of this worthy and useful book must come with warnings of its gaps and a probable need for the reader to sometimes skim and skip.

 

First published in the Mail & Guardian, 15-21 July 2011, but this has a few minor textual differences

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? *